Calvinism's Incoherent Hypersensitivity Part II - Who Get's Credit?

Hypersensitivity is being overly sensitive about an issue.  It is being irrational and even incoherent over a topic.  That is exactly what Calvinism does on some issues that are vigorously tied to their doctrines.  Part 1 was about Calvinism's strange view regarding the Sovereignty of God and Part II has to do with God getting all the credit and man getting none.

#2: God Getting All The Credit and Man Getting None

Calvinists are ultra-hyper about man getting any credit at all when it comes to salvation. That man would receive credit for anything really bothers Calvinists.  Their strange idea that if man believes God he earns credit for his salvation seems to come out of nowhere. Calvinists maintain that if men are able to believe on their own then they have something to do with their own salvation.

The traditional Biblical view is that man does believe unto salvation but this does not give man any credit whatsoever.  Calvinists vehemently insist that man can get no credit whatsoever for salvation and if man could believe on his own, then man could boast that he had something to do with his salvation.

This is faulty thinking on many levels.  First, where does this concern come from because it is clearly not a stated issue in scripture?  I cannot think of a verse that addresses this except that man should boast only in the cross.  Apparently it is not a problem for God because scripture shows no sensitivity to it.  God is not in heaven fretting that he gets 100% of the credit.  God is simply not a narcissist but you might not know that if you believe in Calvinism.

I have been told by Calvinists that even if man's involvement is just .0001%, it is too much and that God just can't have that!  I find this ludicrous on many accounts.  First, what if God wanted man to get a little credit?  I am not saying that God does want man to have credit but what if he did? Apparently Calvinists don't believe that God can do what he desires if it disagrees with their premises.

The other problem is the whole notion that man can get credit for believing in God in the first place. I don't understand the Calvinist reasoning that man's believing in Christ would give him credit.  The whole idea that this is a problem is ridiculous and is simply foreign to scripture.      

Who Get's It?

Scripture does not state that man gets credit for believing in Christ and his completed work of salvation.  Nor does it state that if man could believe on his own, then he could take credit for his salvation.  Why should he? How anyone can conjure up the idea that man believing in God would somehow make him worthy of praise is silly.  The Bible does not assert this idea at all.  The source of this sensitivity is simply what I refer to as "reformed philosophy" springing from the Reformation's fathers, Martin Luther and John Calvin.

But even as philosophy, it is remarkably incoherent.  Does anyone who believes in anything get credit for earning something simply by believing?  Imagine a fan taking credit because he believed his team won the super bowl after they won it.  Would that fan get any kind of credit because he believed his favorite team won the Super Bowl? Would he be able to boast he won the game by believing his team had won?  Of course not. What a ridiculous notion!  The actual players on the team that won would get all the credit.

Or consider a man being notified that he has inherited a fortune from a rich uncle.  Does his act of going to the bank to sign some papers to receive the fortune allow him to boast that he earned it?  Of course not!  He did nothing to earn it and no person observing his windfall would give him praise for simply receiving what was now his by no effort of his own. Receiving the inheritance doesn't allow him to boast in anything.  What does believing in anything have to do with getting praise for believing in the thing in the first place?
                                                                                                                                     

The only thing man does is receive the gift of salvation and eternal life.
Does receiving a gift that was fully earned mean that one gets praise for it? No.

Consider a man who takes a trip in his boat into the ocean and falls overboard.  Then a fellow boater comes along and throws him a line that will save him and the man grabs it.  Does grabbing the life-saving device allow the man to brag he saved himself? Certainly not!  The man who threw the life-saving device gets all the credit because he did the work of saving.  Would anyone ever give credit to the guy who fell in?  Of course not.  Yet, this is what Calvinism often teaches about man believing in God.                            

The Bible does not ever convey the idea that having faith brings undue credit to the one who displayed faith.  The fact is that Jesus acknowledged faith when he saw it and he was always pleased with it. The fact is that  Hebrews 11 commends many for doing things by faith.  While the Bible shows no apprehension about man getting credit for believing, it does communicate that it pleases God when men do believe.  If God is pleased by man believing, why would anyone worry if it is a work or not?

It should be noted that there is a difference between work unto salvation and salvation by works. This is a major distinction that causes Calvinists much confusion.   Jesus actually told the crowd in John 6 to work for salvation by believing:

Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill. Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you.  John 6:26-27

However Romans 4:1-3 compares Abraham's faith with obtaining salvation by the performing works of the law:

What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, discovered in this matter? If, in fact, Abraham was justified by works, he had something to boast about—but not before God. What does Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness.”

The passage above clearly states that Abraham's believing was not considered works because it contrasts being justified by the works of the law with believing.  Believing God is not considered "works".  Abraham did not get credit for believing but his believing God was credited to him as righteousness.

It is troublesome that Calvinism's hyper-sensitivity regarding man getting any credit actually seems to equate Christ's work at the cross with the simple God-given call to believe in Jesus?  They diminish Christ's work at the cross by insisting that man's believing is somehow equal to Christ's work.

If one really believed that Jesus completed the work of salvation then what could man ever do to get credit if it is already done.  Did Jesus complete his finished work of salvation for man?  Yes.  Then how could man ever add to that work?  He can't!  To say that man can do something to add to  

Only He Could Do This Work!

Christ's completed work is a horrendous notion and is straight from hell.              

Jesus did the work and our only part is believing. Does believing substantiate any equality with Christ's completed work?  NO!  To equate man having faith in Jesus with Christ's completed work is actually a work of cheapening Christ's completed work and yet Calvinism infers this very idea.  Believing is a RESPONSE, not a work.

How could anyone say that receiving the gift of salvation is equal to Christ taking on our sin and punishment? Who can say that faith in Christ is equal of Christ rising from the grave?  They can't!  I get a bit offended when I hear the way Calvinists demean Christ's completed work by saying that if man can believe on his own, he gets some kind of credit for his salvation simply by his believing. This is a ludicrous accusation with no merit in either reason or scripture.

Lastly, what intrigues me most about this issue is the absolute hypocrisy of this hypersensitivity by Calvinists.  While men do believe, I have never heard anyone in any setting boast that they should get credit, praise or validation by simply believing in God. In forty plus years of walking as a Christian I have never heard anyone actually bragging that they believed in God.  The fact is that God wants us to confess with our mouth what God did and that we do believe in his offer of salvation.  This pleases God and gives him glory!

The Calvinist hypocrisy is that Calvinists openly brag and boast that they are "chosen" by God.  It goes something like this:

"I am so blessed because God chose me to be saved." or "I am so happy that I was chosen by God."

In fact, the only kind of boasting I ever hear is this kind of boasting.
I have heard Calvinists boasting profusely in their so-called election to salvation.  One Calvinist tweeted to me that he "was God's favorite" because he was "chosen".  Talk about boasting! The Bible does caution us against boasting in anything but the cross. The only boasting I ever hear comes from Calvinists bragging about how they are the "chosen" ones.

There is no reason for Calvinists to be so hyper about the things I described above except that they may do so out of desperation to give their doctrines some kind of traction.  We should all be concerned about hyper Calvinism and its extreme claims. Let's not be afraid to expose it!

Darrell Brantingham

(Check out my pithy tweets on my Twitter account @confrontcalvin)

Calvinism's Incoherent Hypersensitivity Part 1 - Sovereignty of God

Hypersensitivity is being overly sensitive about an issue that is simply unwarranted.  It is being irrational and even incoherent over one or more facets of a topic.  That is exactly what Calvinism does on some issues that are vigorously tied to their doctrines.  These hypersensitivities drive their doctrines.  There are two hypersensitivity issues that seem to stand above the others and this article discusses the first one.  The second issue will be discussed in a separate blog post.

#1: The Sovereignty of God

Calvinists are so hypersensitive over the "Sovereignty of God" that they have actually redefined the words "sovereign" or "sovereignty" to mean something not found in a dictionary or revealed in scripture.

Calvinist hypersensitivity starts with the idea that God is absolutely sovereign and fully in control. Most Christians believe that God is sovereign and completely in control.  The problem is that Calvinists go well beyond this understanding of sovereignty and this is the subject of this article.

At first look, this does not seem like it should be a problem but if you study Calvinism you find that Calvinists construct doctrines that actually are built first and foremost on the foundation of their understanding of God's sovereignty.  This they do above and beyond all other truths found in scripture.

These questions arise:

1. Why is Calvinism so hypersensitive regarding the sovereignty of God?
2. Why don't Calvinists consider God's love, justice or mercy as foundational as they do his sovereignty?
3. Why is sovereignty held up as more important than any of God's other attributes by Calvinists?

Traditional Christianity has focused more on God's love as the core foundation of God's character and that it is his love that carries his will forward.  By contrast, Calvinists promote God's sovereignty as the overall key aspect in understanding God's character and will.

Considering Calvinism's stance then questions should be asked:
1. Does the Bible portray God as being fixated on his sovereignty?
2.  Does scripture show God to be some kind of narcissist sitting in heaven fretting over the idea that he might not be seen as being sovereign enough?
3. Does God control every aspect for every person including their thoughts?

Fortunately, these questions are easily answered.  While scripture does make it clear that God is sovereign over all things, it does not communicate sovereignty as being greater than God's love, mercy, truth and justice.  This is the case throughout scripture. God's sovereignty is never given priority over his other glorious attributes.

While there are a few mentions of God's sovereignty in the Old Testament, the New Testament rarely mentions the subject.  In fact, the word "sovereign" is mentioned just five times in the entire New Testament and the word "sovereignty" is not used at all.  In comparison, how often does the New Testament mention God's love?  The word "love" is used 261 times in the New Testament and it is usually used in the context of God's love.  "Love" therefore is the emphasis in scripture while sovereignty is acknowledged but never exalted above God's other attributes including love.

The Bible as a whole contains no agenda for God's sovereignty as does Calvinism. Though it is recognized, it is not emphasized like Calvinism insists that it should be. This brings us to the next very important issue that seems so central within Calvinism. That issue is Calvinism's fixation on the concern that man must recognize God's sovereignty as greater than anything else.  Scripture does not establish this sentiment at all.  Instead we find God eschewing his sovereignty so that men may know his humility.  Paul makes it clear:

In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus: 

Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. 

And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death—even death on a cross! Philippians 2:5-8

Jesus stated regarding himself:

Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. Matthew 11:29 

Scripture convinces us that Jesus was more concerned with revealing his humility then being concerned about making sure everyone knew how sovereign he was.

Calvinists proclaim a theology that starts and ends with God being sovereign.  They demand that God's sovereignty be given priority over every other spiritual truth.  It is like they think God is paranoid that man won't think he is sovereign.  I don't think God is sitting in heaven worrying that everyone on earth knows how sovereign he is.  God is not afraid of man's frailties or weaknesses nor is he disturbed that man under values his sovereignty.  It is strange that Calvinism presents God as a kind of narcissist that fears his sovereignty is not preeminent.

This kind of Calvinist philosophy is difficult to substantiate from scripture and it gets worse. Calvinists take their concerns one step further by redefining what 'sovereignty" really means. Reformed theology makes "sovereignty" mean that God has predetermined everything beforehand and this includes everything that happens in the world.  They state that everything that is done is only done by God's good will and pleasure and there is nothing that happens that God did not predestine.

Calvinists claim that everything is pre-fixed and that man does not have free-will to do anything on his own.  In doing so, Calvinists simply make God a master manipulator or micro-manager of everything that has happened or will happen in the future.

Noted Reformed Author Edwin Palmer, a leader in Calvinism stated it this way:

“All things that happen in all the world at any time and in all history—whether inorganic matter, vegetation, animal, man or angels (both good and evil ones-- come to pass because God ordained them, Even sin- the fall of the devil from 

heaven, the fall of Adam, and every evil thought, word, and deed in all of history.” (The Five Points of Calvinism, 1999)

And

R.C. Sproul Jr. wrote:  “…God desired for man to fall into sin…God created sin.” (Almighty Over All)

However, this definition of "sovereignty" is not what the word means at all and is simply not found in scripture either. Instead, study of scripture clearly shows that God constantly offers choices to men and God holds man accountable for his actions.  How would God hold man accountable if God predetermined every action of man?  This is not coherent thinking and really bad theology.

Why Calvinists are so hyper about God's sovereignty is not something I claim to understand but my suspicion is that their understanding of "sovereignty" is needed to establish their Reformed doctrines. Calvinism needs God to be a micro-meddler for their doctrines to stand.  Only if God has predetermined all things can the Calvinist doctrines of Unconditional Election and Irresistible Grace be considered legitimate.  If these doctrines are revealed as illegitimate, then the whole of Calvinism collapses like a deck of cards.

Clearly the sovereignty of God should not be overly emphasized and held up above every other word or teaching in scripture.  God is not concerned or paranoid about his sovereignty and his sovereignty is clean and pure.  God is not the "Predeterminator in Chief".  God's sovereignty simply means he has the ultimate say in all things even if in his sovereignty he determines that man has free-will.

I believe that God is sovereign and can do anything he wants at any time, at any place and to any entity but I don't believe he has predetermined all things including evil.  He has predestined that some things happen but there are things that happen on this earth that God has no pleasure in and would never predetermine.

In fact, Genesis records God's thoughts in Genesis 6:5-7:

The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time. The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.”

This passage proves that God does not predetermine all things.  The fact that God has the ability to regret shows that man can do things that actually hurts God.

I am repulsed by Calvinism's theory that God has desired to predetermine man and the devil's sin and rebellion.  I find it abhorrent that Calvinism implies that God could predetermine rape, murder, betrayal and torture.  I find it inconceivable that God would predetermine that Hitler murder six million Jews.  I find it repugnant that God would predetermine that Stalin murder 23 million people civilians above and beyond the 20 million Soviets that perished in World War II.  I find it appalling that God could have predetermined that Mao kill more than 49 million people.

Who could tell a weeping mother that the rape, torture and murder of her 8 year old daughter was predetermined by God?  Only a Reformed Calvinist could.

Some Calvinists teach that God creates evil and they have only one passage to hinge their statement on. Let's examine that passage:

I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.  Isaiah 45:7 KJV

First, no one should ever build a doctrine from a single verse especially pulled out of context. Secondly, the word "evil" is only seen in the KJV.  No other version translates the Hebrew word in this way and with good reason.  In fact, the Hebrew word means:

“adversity, affliction, calamity, distress, misery.” 

Everyone agrees that God sends all of the above in certain situations to fulfill his purposes.  But the word has nothing to do with moral evil yet Calvinists use this verse to promote the idea that God created moral and spiritual evil.  He did not.  Proverbs 8:13 and Psalm 97:10 state that man should hate evil.  Would God ask us to hate evil if he did not?  There are many verses that state that God hates sin so how could he create sin since sin is evil?  Consider:

For thou art not a God that hath pleasure in wickedness: neither shall evil dwell with thee.  Psalm 5:4 KJV

God does not predetermine evil.  He does not predetermine that genocide and human torture take place.  When God judged nations in the Old Testament, he was not sending evil but was delivering justice.  Scripture contains no substantiation for God predetermining evil. All evil has its originations in Satan and the fall of man.

The Bible conveys that idea that God proves his sovereignty by allowing man to make choices and manage certain aspects in their lives.  God does not predetermine all things; instead he intervenes whenever and however he chooses.  This is true sovereignty. That is why we pray because God intervenes by his sovereignty.  Why would anyone pray if all things are predetermined?

Calivnism's hypersensitivity regarding the sovereignty of God then is unwarranted and is simply not a scriptural understanding of God's true sovereignty.

Darrell Brantingham

(Check out my pithy tweets on my Twitter account @confrontcalvin)