Why This Blog?

This Blog is dedicated to the true gospel of the Bible which is Jesus, crucified and risen from the dead to give men his life. This true gospel is the standard by which Calvinism is confronted.

Friday, November 27, 2015

Confronting Calvinism's Romans 9 - Part 1 - It Is About Israel

Calvinists revere and hold to Romans 9 as their greatest proof text in all of the Bible.  If you get into a discussion with a Calvinist they will usually start their support of Calvinism with Romans 9.  By their own admission Romans 9 is the best that they have.  For me the idea that Romans 9 proves Calvinism is laugh-out-loud delusional because its message has nothing at all to do with personal salvation or redemption let alone unconditional election.

The problem is that Calvimists partake of Romans 9 much like a kid eats an Oreo cookie. The Oreo cookie has two hard chocolate outside pieces but in the middle there is the sweet white icing.  For kids the two outside chocolate ends are a little boring so they go right for their favorite part which is the sweet white icing in the middle.  Many kids simply twist off one of the chocolate ends and then scrape the icing off with their teeth and then leave the chocolate ends sitting on the table.
Calvinists approach Romans 9 the same way.  They ignore the top and bottom portions of Romans 9 like a kid does the chocolate outsides of an Oreo cookie and they go right towards their sweet icing of verses in the middle of Romans 9.  This approach works great with cookies but is huge error when it comes to exegeting a passage in scripture. The verses that begin and end Romans 9 are critical to the accurate exegesis of the middle verses as are the first few verses of Romans 10.

The purpose of my two part blog series on Romans 9 is to refute what Calvinism teaches about Romans 9 because it is simply exegetical malfeasance and if one knows how to study scripture then this abuse of Romans 9 cannot and must not be believed.  In this article (Part 1), I will deal with the context of Romans 9.  In Part 2 I will confront Calvinism's sweet white icing in the middle of the passage and show a multitude of errors that Calvinists use to make Romans 9 their greatest proof text. Also in Part 2, I will show why the middle verses of Romans 9 prove nothing about Calvinism or their pet doctrine "unconditional election".  I'll tear the middle verses apart verse by verse so that it will be clearly seen what these verses are saying and it will be in full context of Romans 9.  Brace yourself now because I am about to share a plethora of scriptures.

The full context of Romans 9 is clearly about Israel and the Gentiles. What then is the middle of Romans 9 about?  The answer is: Israel and the Gentiles.  One cannot simply pull scriptures willy-nilly from the middle of context and then build a major doctrine with it. This is irresponsible exegesis and yet this is what Calvinism does with Romans 9.  I now go through Romans 9, verse for verse:
1 I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,
2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart.
3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:
4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen. 
In verses 1 through 5 Paul does two things.  First he lays out all that was given to the people of Israel by God.  Everything had been given to them including the adoption to sonship and the divine glory.  Secondly Paul lays out his heart for his Jewish brothers. Paul goes so far to say that he wished he would be accursed in order that all his kinsmen from Israel's heritage would know Christ and not be lost.  Does this sound like Paul believed in unconditional election?  If so, he was disagreeing out loud with God for not choosing all of Israel. Instead Paul is lamenting the fate of Israel which had been God's elect nation but was now falling short due to their unbelief. Make no mistake. Romans 9 starts out with nothing outside of the plight of Israel.  Moving on:
6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
9 For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son.
10 And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac;
11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)
In verses 6 through 11 Paul continues with his concern over Israel and he tells the story of God's promise and Abraham's seed.  Once again, Roman 9 from verses 1 through 11 is about Israel.    
12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.
13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.
14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.
15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
Is it any surprise that verses 12 through 16 continue with the theme of Israel and is about the key players in Israel's history and lineage?  NOTE: We have just hit the part that Calvinists like to use but please see that these verses are simply the continuation of Paul's comments on ISRAEL.

I will fully debunk the verses above in Part 2 of my two part series but for now please note that these verses are about Israel.
17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.
19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?
20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:
23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
24 Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?
Paul still has not changed his subject.  These verses are still about Israel and also now mentions Gentiles too.  He speaks about Pharoah and God's mercy.  Verses 23 and 24 are about God offering salvation to the Gentiles and not about people in general.  We'll dissect the verses above in great detail in Part 2 and show the errors of Calvinism.

Anybody who can take what Paul wrote above and twist it to make it about God having some kind of strange unconditional election is truly pursuing a most desperate agenda.

Note:  This ends the white sweet icing part that Calvinist's emphasize.  Now we are on to the part that they ignore again.  Hello chocolate end!
25 As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved.
26 And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God.
27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:
28 For he will finish the work, and cut it short in righteousness: because a short work will the Lord make upon the earth.
29 And as Esaias said before, Except the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrha.
No surprise here but the preceding verses are all about Israel again.  All of Romans 9 is on the same subject.  Verse 25 shows that God changes his elect out.  Israel was once his chosen people but now they which were beloved become the not beloved. Verse 27 truly proves Calvinism "unconditional election" as false. Remember Israel was God's elect all through the Old Testament yet only some of them are saved verse 27.  So only some of God's elect are saved?  This verse and the above passage proves Calvinism is a farce.
30 What shall we say then? That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness which is of faith.
31 But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.
32 Wherefore? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumblingstone;      
33 As it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a stumblingstone and rock of offence: and whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.
Okay already---broken record!  The final passage is about Israel too.  Who would have guessed?  In verse 30 Paul shows how the Gentiles who were not following after righteousness now can openly come to God's righteousness by faith.  Then verse 31 shows that Israel fell short of what it was called to.  Why?  Verse 32 spells it out.  Israel was rejected by God because they stumbled over the stumblingstone which required faith.  Verses 30, 32 and 33 all make it clear that Israel was rejected by God because they did not come to faith.  These final verses prove that Romans 9 is about Israel and their rejection of him because of faith.  Calvinists never quote these last verses.  Why?  Because they clearly show the importance of man believing.  It is faith which completes a man's election and this is Paul's wonderful message here.  Calvinists believe that man gets faith after he gets saved but Romans 9 makes mincemeat out of this wayward doctrine.

Hebrews 3:16-19 proves the exegesis above:
16 Now who were they who heard and yet were rebellious? Was it not all those who left Egypt under the leadership of Moses? 17 But with whom was he angry forty years? Was it not those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? 18 And to whom did he swear that they would not enter his rest, if not to those who were disobedient? 19 So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief.
Not Done: Romans 10 Must Be Reviewed Too!

But we are not done because we also must consider the first few verses of Romans 10 which continue Paul's thoughts on Israel which he started in Romans 9.  Remember Paul wrote Romans as a letter and did not include chapter and verse.  Romans 10 adds to Romans 9:
1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.
3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one  
that believeth.
5 For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.
6 But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)
7 Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.)
In the verses above Paul wraps up his comments on Israel but he makes sure that he mentions once again the need for believing in verse 4 and for having faith in verse 6.
Then Paul proclaims clearly how people are saved in the following verses:
8 But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach; 
9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. 
10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 
11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 
12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. 
13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. 
14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? 
15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
In the above, Paul changes gears having finished his teaching on Israel and the Gentiles.  He segues into the truth about how people are saved.  Verses 9, 10, and 11 are about personal salvation and applies to all men.  Paul does not mention election let alone unconditional election.  In fact, Paul uses the word "whosoever" two times in verses 11 and 13 which indicates that salvation is now available to all men.  He speaks about men calling on God and this is how they are saved in verse 13.  Finally, in beautiful fashion Paul lays out the need for the preaching of the gospel in both verse 9 and verse 15.

In concluding Part 1, it should be abundantly clear that Romans 9 proves nothing for Calvinism or their pet doctrine of unconditional election.  Romans 9 is about God's dealings with Israel and the Gentiles.  It is about Israel not moving in faith and Paul makes it clear in both Romans 9 and 10 that one must have faith to be saved.

Romans 9 is not an Oreo cookie at all. It has the same substance from top to bottom. What Calvinsm has done is make Romans 9 into something that it isn't.   Romans 9 is a cookie of one
substance if we continue the metaphor.  There is no sweet white icing in the middle.  From start to finish, Romans 9 is about Israel and its rejection of God's promises by not embracing them in faith. It is about God removing his favor upon Israel and moving that favor to the Gentiles. Romans 9 is Calvinism's best proof text and it falls woefully short in proving any of Calvinism's wayward doctrines.  No one should be deceived by the Calvinist error of pulling scripture out of context and then attempting to make it about something that it isn't.

Please look for Part 2  which I will publish shortly.  In Part 2 I will put great emphasis on explaining why the middle verses of Romans 9 that Calvinists use do not support unconditional election or Calvinism in any way.

Darrell Brantingham

(Check out my pithy tweets on Twitter @confrontcalvin).


Saturday, November 14, 2015

My Response To Recent Slander

It is no surprise to anyone that I have tremendous problems with Calvinism doctrine which I believe is for the most part, false doctrine.  But what shocks me just as much as Calvinism itself is the tactic by Calvinists who do not agree with me especially on Twitter. Though none of my tweets are directed at these individuals, these folks sometimes post slander and lies about me and this happens to others as well.  I guess it is okay with these guys to slander someone directly if you do not agree with them even if your charge is fully false and slanderous in nature.

Such is the work of Colin Maxwell (@weecalvin who recently slandered me on Twitter and a blog that he operates.  Here is what he recently posted on his website:


and on his Twitter:


The above is an out-and-out lie and truly slanderous.  I am not a Universalist.  For those who don't know the term, Universalists believe that all men will eventually be redeemed and that hell is either not eternal or literal.  I do NOT believe in Universalism.  To set the record straight, I believe that the Bible is clear that if a person does not believe in Jesus and rejects Christ's free gift of salvation that he is going to hell for eternity and it is a literal hell where that person will suffer immensely.  Does that sound like Universalism to you?

My point in my tweet replete with its 140 character limitation is that some Calvinists state rather disingenuously that God offers salvation to all but in the end God only saves some who are the "elect'.  By the way, that is what Calvinists have clearly written and my response is to their comments.  I have read this kind of statement many times from some Calvinists.  It is actually the lighter Calvinist opinion on the subject because some Calvinists state that God only offers salvation to only a few.  

Either way, Mr. Maxwell's charge that I am a Universalist is completely false and I hope that he will apologize for it.  This kind of rancor that is simply a personal attack where people's names are slandered is wrong.  I post a lot of information that is negative to Calvinism but I do not troll for other people's posts and then challenge them.  Neither do I make lying and slanderous statements to those on Twitter or anywhere else for that matter.  I don't even mind the many times that Calvinists on Twitter have named me by name in their tweets as one that they disagree with in terms of my tweets but when someone boldly lies and slanders a person then the line has been crossed.  

I forgive Mr. Maxwell but I think this tactic of slandering someone because you don't like the argument is a lowly one and should be called out as such.  He is not the only Calvinist to call me a Universalist for simply stating that Jesus died for all men.  Strangely enough, one Calvinist even called me a Universalist simply for tweeting 1 Timothy 2:3-4 with no additional comments.  That is crazy!

I know that all Calvinists do not lie and slander but there are some who do.  Those that do should be ashamed of these tactics.  Neither do I condone the actions of those who oppose Calvinism that may choose to do the same.  

My posts are not directed towards hardcore believers in Calvinism.  My chances of changing their minds are very slim.  The goal of my tweets and blog posts is to do the following:

1. Support others like me who are exposing Calvinism.
2. Provide an alternative message to those who lean towards Calvinism but who have not heard an alternative message.
3. Inform folks who are simply trying to find out the truth about Calvinism.
4. Warn those who have not heard of Calvinism so that they will know what it is when they hear it.

My goal is not to antagonize those who are hard and fast Calvinist believers. I purposely do all I can to not follow these kinds of Calvinists on Twitter especially since I have no interest in getting involved in worthless arguments.  I even block these kinds of folks on Twitter so that they don't have to even see my tweets and posts.  In other words, I don't have ANY interest in arguing with those who already believe Calvinism is what they think it is.

Thanks for reading this post on my thoughts on this so that people can know not only that I am not a Universalist but also so folks can know my heart and my intentions.  The fact is I have good friends that are Calvinists and I love all men including Calvinists. Colin is probably a great guy and I respect his passion for what he believes in.  I would probably enjoy speaking with him but enough of the slander, please...

Darrell Brantingham

(Check out my pithy tweets @confrontcalvin on Twitter)